🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.