🔗 Share this article

Among the most famous photographs from the 20th century portrays an unclothed child, her hands spread wide, her face contorted in terror, her skin scorched and peeling. She is dashing toward the camera as escaping an airstrike during the Vietnam War. Beside her, additional kids also run from the destroyed village of the region, against a background featuring thick fumes and soldiers.

The Global Effect from an Powerful Picture

Shortly after the release in June 1972, this picture—originally called "The Terror of War"—turned into a traditional hit. Witnessed and analyzed globally, it is broadly attributed with galvanizing worldwide views opposing the American involvement during that era. An influential thinker subsequently commented that this deeply unforgettable picture featuring nine-year-old the girl in agony probably did more to fuel popular disgust toward the conflict than a hundred hours of televised violence. A renowned English war photographer who covered the fighting called it the ultimate photograph from what would later be called the televised conflict. Another veteran photojournalist stated that the image stands as in short, one of the most important photos ever taken, specifically from that conflict.

A Long-Standing Claim Followed by a Recent Claim

For 53 years, the image was assigned to the work of Nick Út, a young South Vietnamese photographer employed by an international outlet in Saigon. But a controversial latest film streaming on a streaming service claims which states the iconic image—long considered to be the pinnacle of photojournalism—may have been captured by someone else on the scene in Trảng Bàng.

According to the investigation, The Terror of War was actually taken by a stringer, who provided his work to the AP. The allegation, along with the documentary's resulting inquiry, originates with a man named an ex-staffer, who alleges that the powerful editor directed him to change the image’s credit from the original photographer to Út, the one employed photographer there at the time.

This Investigation to find Answers

Robinson, advanced in years, contacted one of the journalists in 2022, requesting assistance to locate the unnamed photographer. He stated that, if he was still living, he hoped to give an apology. The investigator considered the freelance photographers he had met—likening them to current independents, just as Vietnamese freelancers during the war, are often ignored. Their work is frequently challenged, and they work in far tougher situations. They are not insured, no long-term security, little backing, they usually are without proper gear, and they remain highly exposed when documenting within their homeland.

The investigator asked: “What must it feel like for the individual who made this iconic picture, if in fact it wasn't Nick Út?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it could be profoundly difficult. As a student of photojournalism, specifically the celebrated documentation from that war, it would be groundbreaking, maybe career-damaging. The revered legacy of "Napalm Girl" in the diaspora is such that the filmmaker who had family fled at the time was reluctant to pursue the investigation. He stated, I was unwilling to unsettle the accepted account that credited Nick the image. Nor did I wish to change the current understanding within a population that always admired this achievement.”

The Inquiry Unfolds

But both the investigator and his collaborator felt: it was necessary asking the question. As members of the press must hold everybody else in the world,” noted the journalist, “we have to can pose challenging queries within our profession.”

The investigation tracks the investigators in their pursuit of their research, including testimonies from observers, to public appeals in today's Saigon, to archival research from additional films taken that day. Their work finally produce a name: a freelancer, employed by NBC at the time who also provided images to the press on a freelance basis. As shown, an emotional Nghệ, now also advanced in age based in the US, claims that he sold the photograph to the AP for minimal payment and a copy, only to be troubled by not being acknowledged for decades.

This Backlash Followed by Additional Scrutiny

Nghệ appears in the footage, thoughtful and thoughtful, however, his claim became explosive within the community of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to